Utility of Cell Saver in Trauma Compared to Cardiac Surgery

While reperfusion of autologous blood using the Cellsaver (CS) device is routine in cardiothoracic surgery, there is a paucity of evidence-based literature regarding its use in trauma. Utility of CS was compared in these two distinct populations at a Level 1 trauma center from 2017 to 2022. CS was s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American surgeon 2023-08, Vol.89 (8), p.3516-3518
Hauptverfasser: Couch, Brandon R., Kim, Eunjee, Shrestha, Kripa, Dhanasekara, Chathurika S., Sabu-Kurian, Anna, Dissanaike, Sharmila D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:While reperfusion of autologous blood using the Cellsaver (CS) device is routine in cardiothoracic surgery, there is a paucity of evidence-based literature regarding its use in trauma. Utility of CS was compared in these two distinct populations at a Level 1 trauma center from 2017 to 2022. CS was successfully used in 97% and 74% of cardiac and trauma cases, respectively. The proportion of blood requirements provided by CS, compared to allogenic transfusion, was also significantly higher in cardiac surgery. However, there was still net benefit for CS in trauma surgery, with median salvaged transfusion volume of one unit, in both general & orthopedic trauma. Therefore, in centers where the cost of setting up CS, both in terms of equipment and personnel, is less than the cost of one unit of blood from blood bank, use of CS in trauma operations should be considered.
ISSN:0003-1348
1555-9823
DOI:10.1177/00031348231161699