Telephone follow‐up contributes to improving adherence and treatment duration in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib
Background and Aim This study aimed to investigate whether telephone follow‐up by clinical pharmacists for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with lenvatinib (LEN) contributes to improved adherence and treatment duration for LEN. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 13...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2023-07, Vol.38 (7), p.1140-1147 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and Aim
This study aimed to investigate whether telephone follow‐up by clinical pharmacists for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with lenvatinib (LEN) contributes to improved adherence and treatment duration for LEN.
Methods
This retrospective study enrolled 132 patients with HCC who were treated with LEN. The patients were classified into non‐telephone follow‐up (n = 32) or telephone follow‐up groups (n = 100) [the latter group was further classified into family‐pharmacist (FP) telephone follow‐up (n = 18), or hospital family‐pharmacist (HFP) telephone follow‐up (n = 82) groups].
Results
The progression‐free survival (PFS) in the telephone follow‐up group was significantly higher than that in the non‐telephone follow‐up group (PFS 6.1 months vs 3.7 months, P = 0.001, respectively). Although treatment duration was significantly longer in the telephone follow‐up group than in the non‐telephone follow‐up group [median treatment duration: 10.4 months vs 4.1 months, P = 0.001, respectively.], no significant differences were noted between the HFP telephone follow‐up group and FP telephone follow‐up groups (10.3 months vs 13.3 months, P = 0.543). Self‐interruption and adverse‐event discontinuation in the HFP‐telephone follow‐up group were significantly lower than those in the FP‐telephone and non‐telephone groups (0% vs 11.1% vs 18.8%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jgh.16168 |