Comparison of 2D and 3D carbon/carbon composites with respect to damage and fracture resistance
The static mechanical responses of two- and three-dimensionally reinforced carbon/carbon composites (2D- and 3D-C/Cs) were compared. The mechanical properties examined included tensile and shear stress–strain (S–S) relations, and fracture behavior using compact tension and double edge notch configur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Carbon (New York) 2003, Vol.41 (5), p.1069-1078 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The static mechanical responses of two- and three-dimensionally reinforced carbon/carbon composites (2D- and 3D-C/Cs) were compared. The mechanical properties examined included tensile and shear stress–strain (S–S) relations, and fracture behavior using compact tension and double edge notch configurations. Compared with 2D-C/Cs, 3D-C/Cs were shown to possess a similar tensile S–S relation, lower shear strength, higher ultimate deformation in shear, and much higher fracture resistance. The differences in shear and fracture resistance were shown to be derived from a weaker fiber/matrix interface and weaker bonding between fiber bundles in the 3D-C/Cs. These weak interface characteristics of 3D-C/Cs are due to the high value of residual stresses caused by the three-dimensional fiber constraint of 3D-C/Cs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-6223 1873-3891 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00442-6 |