Fear of Cancer Recurrence Therapy (FORT): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: Most fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) interventions have small effects, and few target FCR. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) with breast and gynecological cancer survivors evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive-existential fear of recurrence therapy (FORT) compared to an attention pla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health psychology 2023-03, Vol.42 (3), p.182-194
Hauptverfasser: Maheu, Christine, Lebel, Sophie, Bernstein, Lori J., Courbasson, Christine, Singh, Mina, Ferguson, Sarah E., Harris, Cheryl, Jolicoeur, Lynne, Baku, Lorena, Muraca, Linda, Ramanakumar, Agnihotram V., Lamonde, Frederic, Lefebvre, Monique, Tomei, Christina, Mutsaers, Brittany, Secord, Scott, Power, Joanne, Drummond, Nancy, Hébert, Maude, Wani, Rajvi J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Most fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) interventions have small effects, and few target FCR. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) with breast and gynecological cancer survivors evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive-existential fear of recurrence therapy (FORT) compared to an attention placebo control group (living well with cancer [LWWC]) on FCR. Method: One hundred and sixty-four women with clinical levels of FCR and cancer distress were randomly assigned to 6-weekly, 120 min FORT (n = 80) or LWWC (n = 84) group sessions. They completed questionnaires at baseline (T1), posttreatment (T2; primary endpoint), 3 (T3), and 6 months (T4) posttreatment. Generalized linear models were used to compare group differences in the fear of cancer recurrence inventory (FCRI) total score and secondary outcomes. Results: FORT participants experienced greater reductions from T1 to T2 on FCRI total with a between-group difference of −9.48 points (p = .0393), resulting in a medium effect of −0.530, with a maintained effect at T3 (p = .0330) but not at T4. For the secondary outcomes, improvements were in favor of FORT, including FCRI triggers (p = .0208), FCRI coping (p = .0351), cognitive avoidance (p = .0155), need for reassurance from physicians (p = .0117), and quality of life (mental health; p = .0147). Conclusions: This RCT demonstrated that FORT, compared to an attention placebo control group, resulted in a greater reduction in FCR posttreatment and at 3 months posttreatment in women with breast and gynecological cancer, indicating its potential as a new treatment strategy. We recommend a booster session to sustain gains.
ISSN:0278-6133
1930-7810
DOI:10.1037/hea0001253