A comparison of results derived from scaling VS chirp-ionosonde ionograms with the international reference ionosphere (IRI)

The results derived from processing vertical-incidence ionograms obtained with the chirp-ionosonde at Irkutsk for different winter time intervals (February) and at equinox are presented. The peak height hmF2 was determined by Dudeney's formula based on ionogram parameters, including the coeffic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics 2003-03, Vol.65 (4), p.409-416
Hauptverfasser: Grozov, V.P., Kotovich, G.V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The results derived from processing vertical-incidence ionograms obtained with the chirp-ionosonde at Irkutsk for different winter time intervals (February) and at equinox are presented. The peak height hmF2 was determined by Dudeney's formula based on ionogram parameters, including the coefficient M(3000). The algorithm is suggested for determining the coefficient M(3000) in the automatic mode using the conventional form of the transfer curve method without invoking a standard transparency called the “transfer curve”. The parameters foF2 and hmF2 are compared with the international reference ionosphere (IRI-95) model. It is found that in most cases the values of the foF2 and hmF2 parameters, calculated in the IRI-95 model, are similar to the median ones. It is confirmed that for practical purposes where it is necessary to know the radio wave propagation conditions along the propagation path, the IRI model is convenient and attractive.
ISSN:1364-6826
1879-1824
DOI:10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00298-5