A framework for brain tumor detection based on segmentation and features fusion using MRI images

[Display omitted] •State-of-the art brain tumor segmentation techniques require expert brain tumor detection.•Automatic brain tumor extraction improves the detection performance.•Feature fusion and classification using DL network outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Irregular growth of cells in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain research 2023-05, Vol.1806, p.148300-148300, Article 148300
Hauptverfasser: Mohamad Mostafa, Almetwally, El-Meligy, Mohammed A., Abdullah Alkhayyal, Maram, Alnuaim, Abeer, Sharaf, Mohamed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •State-of-the art brain tumor segmentation techniques require expert brain tumor detection.•Automatic brain tumor extraction improves the detection performance.•Feature fusion and classification using DL network outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Irregular growth of cells in the skull is recognized as a brain tumor that can have two types such as benign and malignant. There exist various methods which are used by oncologists to assess the existence of brain tumors such as blood tests or visual assessments. Moreover, the noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique without ionizing radiation has been commonly utilized for diagnosis. However, the segmentation in 3-dimensional MRI is time-consuming and the outcomes mainly depend on the operator’s experience. Therefore, a novel and robust automated brain tumor detector has been suggested based on segmentation and fusion of features. To improve the localization results, we pre-processed the images using Gaussian Filter (GF), and SynthStrip: a tool for brain skull stripping. We utilized two known benchmarks for training and testing i.e., Figshare and Harvard. The proposed methodology attained 99.8% accuracy, 99.3% recall, 99.4% precision, 99.5% F1 score, and 0.989 AUC. We performed the comparative analysis of our approach with prevailing DL, classical, and segmentation-based approaches. Additionally, we also performed the cross-validation using Harvard dataset attaining 99.3% identification accuracy. The outcomes exhibit that our approach offers significant outcomes than existing methods and outperforms them.
ISSN:0006-8993
1872-6240
DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148300