Barriers and facilitators to use of compression therapy by people with venous leg ulcers: A qualitative exploration

Aims To explore barriers to, and facilitators of, adherence to compression therapy, from the perspective of people with venous leg ulcers. Design An interpretive, qualitative, descriptive study involving interviews with patients. Methods Participants were purposively sampled from respondents to a su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of advanced nursing 2023-07, Vol.79 (7), p.2568-2584
Hauptverfasser: Perry, Catherine, Atkinson, Ross A., Griffiths, Jane, Wilson, Paul M., Lavallée, Jacqueline F., Cullum, Nicky, Dumville, Jo C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims To explore barriers to, and facilitators of, adherence to compression therapy, from the perspective of people with venous leg ulcers. Design An interpretive, qualitative, descriptive study involving interviews with patients. Methods Participants were purposively sampled from respondents to a survey exploring attitudes to compression therapy in people with venous leg ulcers. Sampling continued until data saturation: 25 interviews between December 2019 and July 2020. Inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts was undertaken to create a framework for the data, followed by deductive analysis informed by the Common‐Sense Model of Self‐Regulation. Results A range of knowledge and understanding about the cause of venous leg ulcers and the mechanisms of compression therapy was demonstrated, which was not particularly related to adherence. Participants talked about their experience with different compression methods and their concerns about the length of time healing could take. They also spoke about aspects of the organization of services which affected their care. Conclusion Identifying specific, individual barriers/facilitators to compression therapy is not simple, rather factors combine to make adherence more or less likely or possible. There was no clear relationship between an understanding of the cause of VLUs or the mechanism of compression therapy and adherence; different compression therapies presented different challenges for patients; unintentional non‐adherence was frequently mentioned; and the organization of services could impact on adherence. Ways in which people could be supported to adhere to compression therapy are indicated. Implications for practice include issues relating to communication with patients; taking into account patients' lifestyles and ensuring that they know about useful ‘aids’; providing services that are accessible and provide continuity of appropriately trained staff; minimizing unintentional non‐adherence; and acknowledging that healthcare professionals will always need to support/advise those who cannot tolerate compression. Impact Compression therapy is a cost‐effective, evidence‐based treatment for venous leg ulcers. However, there is evidence that patients do not always adhere to this therapy and there is limited research investigating reasons why patients do not wear compression. The study found no clear relationship between an understanding of the cause of VLUs or the mechanism of compression therapy and a
ISSN:0309-2402
1365-2648
DOI:10.1111/jan.15608