Dutch professionals' discussion preferences with the parents of extremely premature infants varied, but the trend was towards shared decision‐making

Aim We explored professionals' views on sharing decision‐making with parents before and after an extremely preterm birth and what healthcare professionals considered severe outcomes. Methods A nationwide, multi‐centre online survey was carried out among a wide range of perinatal healthcare professionals in the Netherlands from 4 November 2020 to 10 January 2021. The medical chairs of all nine Dutch Level III and IV perinatal centres helped to disseminate the survey link. Results We received 769 survey responses. Most respondents (53%) preferred to place equal emphasis on two treatment options during shared prenatal decision‐making: early intensive care or palliative comfort care. The majority (61%) wanted to include a conditional intensive care trial as a third treatment option, but 25% disagreed. Most (78%) felt that healthcare professionals were responsible for initiating postnatal conversations to justify continuing or withdrawing neonatal intensive care if complications were associated with poor outcomes. Finally, 43% were satisfied with the current definitions of severe long‐term outcomes, 41% were unsure and there were numerous for a broader definition. Conclusion Although Dutch professionals expressed diverse preferences on how to reach decisions about extremely premature infants, we observed a trend towards shared decision‐making with parents. These results could inform future guidelines.