Effects of somatic acupoint stimulation on anxiety and depression in cancer patients: An updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials

To explore the effectiveness of somatic acupoint stimulation (SAS) for cancer patients with anxiety and depression. Thirteen electronic databases were searched systematically until August 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating SAS for anxiety and/or depression in cancer patients wer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Complementary therapies in clinical practice 2023-05, Vol.51, p.101735-101735, Article 101735
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Tao, Tan, Jing-Yu (Benjamin), Yao, Li-Qun, Huilin Cheng, Zhao, Isabella, Eliseeva, Sabina, Polotan, Mary Janice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To explore the effectiveness of somatic acupoint stimulation (SAS) for cancer patients with anxiety and depression. Thirteen electronic databases were searched systematically until August 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating SAS for anxiety and/or depression in cancer patients were retrieved. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by utilizing the Cochrane Back Review Group Risk of Bias Assessment Criteria. Evidence level was assessed by using the approach of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). Both meta-analysis and descriptive analysis were conducted for outcome assessment. Twenty-eight records were finally included including 22 journal articles and six ongoing registered clinical trials. The overall methodological quality and level of evidence of the included studies were suboptimal, with no high-quality evidence identified. Moderate evidence showed that SAS could significantly decrease the anxiety of cancer patients (Acupuncture: [random effect model, SMD = −0.52, 95% CI = −0.79 to −0.24, p = 0.0002] and Acupressure: [random effect model, SMD = −0.89, 95% CI = −1.25 to −0.52, p 
ISSN:1744-3881
1873-6947
DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101735