Determination of a Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Reference Ranges in Japanese Adults Using Fully Automated Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Despite an increasing interest in vitamin D status, a reference range of the nutrient has not been fully established. This is partly due to a paucity of standardized measuring systems with high throughput. In addition, the range may vary by populations and may change with modernization of lifestyles...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nutrition 2023-04, Vol.153 (4), p.1253-1264
Hauptverfasser: Miyamoto, Hiroyasu, Kawakami, Daisuke, Hanafusa, Nobuhiro, Nakanishi, Tsuyoshi, Miyasaka, Masaki, Furutani, Yutaka, Ikeda, Yuichi, Ito, Kyoko, Kato, Tomohiro, Yokoyama, Keitaro, Arakawa, Shoutaro, Saito, Mitsuru, Furusho, Tadasu, Matsuura, Tomokazu, Ochi, Sae
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Despite an increasing interest in vitamin D status, a reference range of the nutrient has not been fully established. This is partly due to a paucity of standardized measuring systems with high throughput. In addition, the range may vary by populations and may change with modernization of lifestyles. This study aims to calculate the current reference concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) among healthy people living in an urban area in Japan. A newly developed fully automated liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) system was used to measure serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Reproducibility was assessed by measuring standardized samples. Accuracy was validated by comparing with commercially available immunoassays. Then, mass screening was conducted targeting participants who received medical checkups in Tokyo from April 2019 to March 2020, and the reference ranges were calculated. The coefficients of variations of interoperator and interday reproducibility were 4.1%–8.5% and 3.7%–8.0% for 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 (25(OH)D2) and 4.7%–7.0% and 4.0%–6.9% for 25-hydroxyvitamine D3, respectively. The measured total 25(OH)D concentrations correlated well with those measured by immunoassays. In total, 5518 participants were measured for 25(OH)D concentrations, among whom 98% showed inadequate concentrations (
ISSN:0022-3166
1541-6100
DOI:10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.01.036