Mechanistic assessment reveals the significance of HRT and MLSS concentration in balancing carbon diversion and removal in the A-stage process

Nowadays, the shift toward energy and resource-efficient wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) has become a necessity rather than a choice. For this purpose, there has been a restored interest in replacing the typical energy and resource-extensive activated sludge process with the two-stage Adsorption/bio-oxidation (A/B) configuration. In the A/B configuration, the role of the A-stage process is to maximize organics diversion to the solids stream and control the following B-stage's influent to allow for the attainment of tangible energy savings. Operating at very short retention times and high loading rates, the influence of the operational conditions on the A-stage process become more tangible than typical activated sludge. Nonetheless, there is very limited understanding of the influence of operational parameters on the A-stage process. Moreover, no studies in the literature have explored the influence of any operational/design parameters on the Alternating Activated Adsorption (AAA) technology which is a novel A-stage variant. Hence, this article mechanistically investigates the independent effect of different operational parameters on the AAA technology. It was inferred that solids retention time (SRT) shall remain below 1 day to allow for energy savings up to 45% and redirecting up to 46% of the influent's COD to the recovery streams. In the meantime, the hydraulic retention time (HRT) can be increased up to 4 h to remove up to 75% of the influent's COD with only 19% decline of the system's COD redirection ability. Moreover, it was observed that the high biomass concentration (above 3000 mg/L) amplified the effect of the sludge poor settleability either due to pin floc settling or high SVI30 which resulted in COD removal below 60%. Meanwhile, the concentration of the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) was not found to be influenced or to influence process performance. The findings of this study can be employed to formulate an integrative operational approach in which different operational parameters are incorporated to better control the A-stage process and achieve complex objectives. •Balancing carbon redirection and removal in A-stage is a key for sustainable WWTPs.•SRT cannot be used solely to control A-stage performance.•COD removal reached 75% by extending HRT with minimal effect on COD redirection.•High MLSS amplified sludge poor settleability causing COD removal below 60%.•EPS was not found to be influenced or to influence process performan