Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA): Which measurements are accurate and reliable?

The variation and accuracy of computed tomography angiography (CTA) features of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) have not been completely characterized. We evaluated anomalous right (AAORCA) and left (AAOLCA) coronary arteries by CTA, with an emphasis on reproducibility, comparis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography 2023-03, Vol.17 (2), p.130-137
Hauptverfasser: Ferraro, Alessandra M., Uslenghi, Alessandro, Lu, Minmin, Newburger, Jane W., Nathan, Meena, Quinonez, Luis G., Beroukhim, Rebecca S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The variation and accuracy of computed tomography angiography (CTA) features of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) have not been completely characterized. We evaluated anomalous right (AAORCA) and left (AAOLCA) coronary arteries by CTA, with an emphasis on reproducibility, comparison with surgical measurements, and effect of nitroglycerin. CTAs were interpreted for location of coronary origin & exit from the aorta, course, and dominance; minor & major diameters of the proximal & distal coronaries; shape of orifice; and intramural length. Relationships between vessel measurements, body surface area (BSA), and nitroglycerin use were evaluated. Comparisons between CTA and surgical measurements included intramural length, surgical probe size pre-intervention vs. CTA proximal AAOCA diameter, and surgical probe size post-intervention vs. CTA distal AAOCA diameter. Of 104 patients [81 (78%) AAORCA], all but 1 were intramural. Compared to AAOLCA, AAORCA patients were more likely to have a high origin (91% vs. 31%, p ​
ISSN:1934-5925
1876-861X
DOI:10.1016/j.jcct.2023.02.003