FIGO recommendations: Use of midurethral slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

Background Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a global problem. It can significantly adversely impact a woman's quality of life. The use of synthetic mesh in vaginal surgery is controversial, especially when used for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Although negative effects have been reported,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2023-05, Vol.161 (2), p.367-385
Hauptverfasser: Lau, Hui‐Hsuan, Davila, G. Willy, Chen, Ying‐Yu, Sartori, Marair G. F., Jármy‐Di Bella, Zsuzsanna I. K., Tsai, Jung‐Mei, Liu, Yu‐Min, Su, Tsung‐Hsien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a global problem. It can significantly adversely impact a woman's quality of life. The use of synthetic mesh in vaginal surgery is controversial, especially when used for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Although negative effects have been reported, the synthetic mesh midurethral sling (MUS) is considered to be safe and effective in the surgical treatment of SUI. Objectives To provide evidence‐based data and recommendations for the obstetrician/gynecologist who treats women with SUI and performs or plans to perform MUS procedures. Methods Academic searches of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar articles published between 1987 and March 2020 were performed by a subgroup of the Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Committee, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). Selection Criteria The obtained scientific data were associated with a level of evidence according to the Oxford University Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine and GRADE Working Group system. In the absence of concrete scientific evidence, the recommendations were made via professional consensus. Results The FIGO Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Committee reviewed the literature and prepared this evidence‐based recommendations document for the use of MUS for women with SUI. Conclusions Despite the extensive literature, there is a lack of consensus in the optimal surgical treatment of SUI. These recommendations provide a direction for surgeons to make appropriate decisions regarding management of SUI. The MUS is considered safe and effective in the treatment of SUI, based on many high‐quality scientific publications and professional society recommendations. Comprehensive long‐term data and systemic reviews are still needed, and these data will become increasingly important as women live longer. These recommendations will be continuously updated through future literature reviews. Synopsis Evidence‐based recommendations for the use of midurethral slings among women with stress urinary incontinence composed by the FIGO Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Committee.
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1002/ijgo.14683