A randomized trial of web-based fertility-tracking software and fecundability

To assess the effect of randomization to FertilityFriend.com, a mobile computing fertility-tracking app, on fecundability. Parallel non-blinded randomized controlled trial nested within the Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), a North American preconception cohort. Female participants aged 21 to 45 year...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2023-06, Vol.119 (6), p.1045-1056
Hauptverfasser: Wise, Lauren A., Wang, Tanran R., Stanford, Joseph B., Wesselink, Amelia K., Ncube, Collette N., Rothman, Kenneth J., Murray, Eleanor J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess the effect of randomization to FertilityFriend.com, a mobile computing fertility-tracking app, on fecundability. Parallel non-blinded randomized controlled trial nested within the Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), a North American preconception cohort. Female participants aged 21 to 45 years attempting conception for ≤6 menstrual cycles at enrolment (2013–2019). Randomization (1:1) of 5532 participants to receive a premium Fertility Friend (FF) subscription. Fecundability (per-cycle probability of conception). Participants completed bimonthly follow-up questionnaires until pregnancy or a censoring event, whichever came first. We first performed an intent-to-treat analysis of the effect of FF randomization on fecundability. In secondary analyses, we used a per-protocol approach that accounted for adherence in each trial arm. In both analyses, we used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing those randomized vs. not randomized and applied inverse probability weights to account for loss-to-follow-up (intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses) and adherence (per-protocol analyses only). Using life-table methods, 64% of the 2775 participants randomized to FF and 63% of the 2767 participants not randomized to FF conceived during 12 cycles; these respective percentages were each 70% among those with 0–1 cycles of attempt time at enrolment. Of those randomized to FF, 72% were defined as adherent (68% of observed menstrual cycles). In intent-to-treat analyses, there was no appreciable association overall (FR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90–1.04) or within strata of pregnancy attempt time at enrolment, age, education, or other characteristics. In per-protocol analyses, we observed little association overall (FR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99–1.14), but weak-to-moderate positive associations among participants who had longer attempt times at enrolment (FR = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.98–1.35 for 3–4 cycles; FR = 1.14; 95% CI, 0.87–1.48 for 5–6 cycles), were aged
ISSN:0015-0282
1556-5653
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.005