Intravascular ultrasound provides additional insights in the hypertensive patients with focal renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia

To date, few study has defined the exact role or utility of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the diagnosis and treatment of renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). We investigated whether using an IVUS would provide additional insights in the hypertensive patients with focal renal artery FMD....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hypertension research 2023-06, Vol.46 (6), p.1407-1416
Hauptverfasser: Kang, Yuanyuan, Wu, Qihong, Xu, Jianzhong, Hong, Mona, Ma, Yu, Tang, Xiaofeng, Zhu, Limin, Gao, Pingjin, Wang, Jiguang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To date, few study has defined the exact role or utility of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the diagnosis and treatment of renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). We investigated whether using an IVUS would provide additional insights in the hypertensive patients with focal renal artery FMD. A prospective, observational study, including all patients with focal renal artery FMD admitted to the Ruijin hospital during 6 consecutive years (2015-2021). Based on IVUS imaging, focal FMD patients were classified as two subtypes: intima-media thickening (IMT) and negative remodeling (NR) of the whole vessel. A total of 36 consecutive patients (24 ± 7, 13-39 years) with focal renal artery FMD were enrolled. Angiographic unifocal type was present in 22 (61.1%) patients and tubular type was present in 14 (38.9%) patients. Among 22 patients with unifocal, IVUS showed that 18 (81.8%) had IMT and 4 (18.2%) had NR. 14 patients with tubular, IVUS showed 3 (21.4%) had IMT and 11 (78.6%) had NR. No difference in age of onset, gender, BMI, initial BP levels were found between IMT and NR subtypes. However, hypertension cure rates of short-term (48 h after angioplasty) (76.2% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.004) and long-term (1-6years) (90.5% vs. 20.0%, p 
ISSN:0916-9636
1348-4214
DOI:10.1038/s41440-023-01216-y