Factors affecting cognitive functions of patients with high-grade gliomas: a systematic review

Background Gliomas make up approximately 26.5% of all primary CNS tumors and 80.7% of malignant tumors. They are classified according to histology, location, and genetics. Grade III and IV gliomas are considered high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The cognitive signs and symptoms are attributed to mass defec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurological sciences 2023-06, Vol.44 (6), p.1917-1929
Hauptverfasser: Tariq, Rabeet, Hussain, Nowal, Baqai, Muhammad Waqas Saeed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Gliomas make up approximately 26.5% of all primary CNS tumors and 80.7% of malignant tumors. They are classified according to histology, location, and genetics. Grade III and IV gliomas are considered high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The cognitive signs and symptoms are attributed to mass defects depending on location, growth rapidity, and edema. Our purpose is to review the cognitive status of patients diagnosed with HGGs; the effect of treatments including surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy; and the predictors of the cognitive status. Methods We utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as a template for the methodology. A comprehensive literature search was performed from three databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library) for clinical trials and longitudinal studies on patients diagnosed with HGGs assessing their cognitive status. Results Thirteen studies were selected among which 9 assessed cognitive function before and after treatment. One assessed the consistency of cognitive complaints and objective cognitive functioning. Three reported factors affecting disease progression and cognitive status. Most HGG patients have impairment in at least one cognitive domain. Treatments including surgical resection or radio-chemotherapy did not impair cognitive status. Discussion The cognitive status could be used to assess sub-clinical tumor progression. Factors correlated to cognitive status were tumor location, edema, and grade. Patient characteristics correlated were pre-operative epilepsy, corticosteroid use, and age at the time of diagnosis. Conclusion Assessment of the cognitive status of HGG patients indicates sub-clinical tumor progression and may be used to assess treatment outcomes.
ISSN:1590-1874
1590-3478
DOI:10.1007/s10072-023-06673-4