Simplified Geleijnse score for identifying chest pain features associated with coronary ischemia
•The Geleijnse score has limited capacity to assess coronary ischemia.•A simplified Geleijnse including clinical manifestations of ischemic-suspected chest pain presents higher predictive ability.•This simplified score may help to identify coronary ischemia and aid decision-making process. The Gelei...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart & lung 2023-05, Vol.59, p.61-66 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •The Geleijnse score has limited capacity to assess coronary ischemia.•A simplified Geleijnse including clinical manifestations of ischemic-suspected chest pain presents higher predictive ability.•This simplified score may help to identify coronary ischemia and aid decision-making process.
The Geleijnse score, which was proposed to assess for coronary ischemia, has practical limitations.
Our aim was to design and evaluate a simplified version of the Geleijnse score.
We enrolled patients with suspected coronary heart disease but negative troponin T or absence of enzymatic curve, and a non-diagnostic 12-lead ECG. The initial study was performed in a retrospective derivation cohort and the results were subsequently validated in a prospective cohort.
From 109 patients included in the derivation cohort, 33 (30.3%) received a diagnosis of coronary heart disease. Chest pain with both arms radiation (OR 3.54), severe intensity (OR 2.41), improvement by nitroglycerin (OR 1.61), associated dyspnea (OR 1.97) and prior exertional angina history (OR 2.91) were independently associated with an ischemic origin on multivariate logistic regression analysis. ROC curves comparison demonstrated both the original and simplified scores presented modest predictive ability with significant difference when analyzed using dichotomous cut-offs (0.647 [simplified] vs. 0.544 [original], p = 0.042) but not as a continuous variable (0.670 [simplified] vs. 0.621 [original], p = 0.396). In 305 patients from the validation cohort, the simplified score presented extensively increased predictive accuracy than the Geleijnse, in the continuous (c-indexes = 0.735 vs. 0.685, p = 0.040) and the dichotomic (c-indexes = 0.682 vs. 0.514, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0147-9563 1527-3288 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2023.01.010 |