Survey of Prophylactic Administration of Naldemedine for Opioid-induced Constipation

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC), an adverse event that occurs due to opioid analgesics, reportedly causes poor quality of life and adherence to opioid analgesics in patients. Therefore, this issue must be addressed appropriately. Naldemedine (NAL), a peripherally-acting μ-opioid receptor antagonis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:YAKUGAKU ZASSHI 2023/02/01, Vol.143(2), pp.183-189
Hauptverfasser: Ozawa, Yuki, Haruki, Yayoi, Ohata, Meiko, Isono, Hisayo, Takahashi, Minami, Tate, Aki, Ukita, Seiko, Hayashi, Seiichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Opioid-induced constipation (OIC), an adverse event that occurs due to opioid analgesics, reportedly causes poor quality of life and adherence to opioid analgesics in patients. Therefore, this issue must be addressed appropriately. Naldemedine (NAL), a peripherally-acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, is currently recommended for treating OIC when other laxatives are ineffective, but there have been no clinical reports of NAL being used prophylactically for OIC. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective survey of hospitalized patients who received NAL as prophylaxis for OIC with strong opioid analgesics to clarify the reality of this situation and to consider points to be taken into account in its clinical implementation. In this study, 61.7% of the subjects had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 3 or higher. The rate of addition of new laxatives and increased laxatives during seven days of NAL prophylaxis was 46.8%, and the rate of diarrhea was 6.1%. This study suggests that patients initiated with strong opioid analgesics during hospitalization often presented with poor performance status, and it is important to pay attention to constipation even under NAL prophylaxis. However, the incidence of diarrhea was low, and the safety of NAL prophylaxis was considered to be good.
ISSN:0031-6903
1347-5231
DOI:10.1248/yakushi.22-00181