Integrated postoperative care model for older colorectal surgery patients improves outcomes and reduces healthcare costs
Background Older surgical patients have an increased risk for postoperative complications, driving up healthcare costs. We determined if postoperative co‐management of older surgery patients is associated with postoperative outcomes and hospital costs. Methods Retrospective data were collected for p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2023-05, Vol.71 (5), p.1452-1461 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Older surgical patients have an increased risk for postoperative complications, driving up healthcare costs. We determined if postoperative co‐management of older surgery patients is associated with postoperative outcomes and hospital costs.
Methods
Retrospective data were collected for patients ≥70 years old undergoing colorectal surgery at a community teaching hospital. Patient outcomes were compared between those receiving postoperative surgery co‐management care through the Optimization of Senior Care and Recovery (OSCAR) program and controls who received standard of care. Main outcome measures were postoperative complications and hospital charges, 30‐day readmission rate, length of stay (LOS), and transfer to intensive care during hospitalization. Multivariable linear regression was used to model total charge and multivariable logistic regression to model complications, adjusted for multiple variables (e.g., age, sex, race, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI], American Society of Anesthesiologists score, surgery duration).
Results
All 187 patients in the OSCAR and control groups had a similar mean CCI score of 2.7 (p = 0.95). Compared to the control group, OSCAR recipients experienced less postoperative delirium (17% vs. 8%; p = 0.05), cardiac arrhythmia (12% vs. 3%; p = 0.03), and clinical worsening requiring transfer to intensive care (20% vs. 6%; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jgs.18216 |