A novel contact-free atrial fibrillation monitor: a pilot study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines support performing electrocardiogram (ECG) screenings to spot AF in high-risk patients. The purpose of this study was to validate a new algorithm aimed to identify AF in patients measured with a recent FDA-clear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal. Digital health 2022-03, Vol.3 (1), p.105-113
Hauptverfasser: Sadeh, Ben, Merdler, Ilan, Sadon, Sapir, Lupu, Lior, Borohovitz, Ariel, Ghantous, Eihab, Taieb, Philippe, Granot, Yoav, Goldstein, Orit, Soriano, Jonathan Calderón, Rubio-Oliver, Ricardo, Ruiz-Rivas, Joaquin, Zalevsky, Zeev, Garcia-Monreal, Javier, Shatsky, Maxim, Polani, Sagi, Arbel, Yaron
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines support performing electrocardiogram (ECG) screenings to spot AF in high-risk patients. The purpose of this study was to validate a new algorithm aimed to identify AF in patients measured with a recent FDA-cleared contact-free optical device. Study participants were measured simultaneously using two devices: a contact-free optical system that measures chest motion vibrations (investigational device, 'Gili') and a standard reference bed-side ECG monitor (Mindray ). Each reference ECG was evaluated by two board certified cardiologists that defined each trace as: regular rhythm, AF, other irregular rhythm or indecipherable/missing. A total of 3582, 30-s intervals, pertaining to 444 patients (41.9% with a history of AF) were made available for analysis. Distribution of patients with active AF, other irregular rhythm, and regular rhythm was 16.9%, 29.5%, and 53.6% respectively. Following application of cross-validated machine learning approach, the observed sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-0.93] and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.95-0.96), respectively. This study demonstrates for the first time the efficacy of a contact-free optical device for detecting AF.
ISSN:2634-3916
2634-3916
DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztab108