Iliofemoral artery predilation prior to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic valve stenosis and advanced peripheral artery disease
Objectives To investigate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the iliofemoral arteries (IFA) before transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (Tf‐TAVI) in patients with advanced peripheral artery disease (PAD). Background Although Tf‐TAVI represent...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2023-02, Vol.101 (3), p.628-638 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
To investigate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the iliofemoral arteries (IFA) before transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (Tf‐TAVI) in patients with advanced peripheral artery disease (PAD).
Background
Although Tf‐TAVI represents the access of choice, alternative vascular access routes are preferred for patients displaying advanced PAD. PTA of the IFA represents a less invasive option, broadening the spectrum of patients eligible for Tf‐TAVI.
Methods
All patients requiring PTA of the IFA before Tf‐TAVI, between 2012 and 2021, were included. Primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of successful transcatheter heart valve (THV) delivery and implantation. Primary safety endpoint was the rate of PTA and access‐site‐related vascular complications, procedural‐ and in‐hospital complications.
Results
Among 2726 Tf‐TAVI procedures, 59 patients required IFA predilation. Successful THV delivery and implantation was achieved in 57 (96.6%) patients, respectively. Sheath placement was achieved in 59 (100%) patients with only one minor dissection and no major vascular complications following iliofemoral PTA. Regarding access site complications, two (3.4%) vessel perforations and one (1.7%) vessel rupture were observed, with eight (13.5%) patients requiring unplanned endovascular interventions. There was one intraprocedural death due to THV‐induced vessel laceration, while in‐hospital all‐cause mortality was 8.5% in the present high‐risk patient cohort.
Conclusions
Predilation of IFA is safe and effective in patients with advanced PAD. Careful preprocedural planning is paramount in improving procedural safety and efficacy. This strategy has the potential to broaden the spectrum of patients eligible for Tf‐TAVI. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.30576 |