Post cholecystectomy benign biliary stricture‐isolated hepatic duct stricture: a proposed modification of the BISMUTH classification
Background Post‐cholecystectomy, benign biliary strictures are challenging for both patients and surgeons. Bismuth classified benign biliary strictures into 5 types. This study aimed to review these isolated hepatic duct strictures which were not included in Bismuth classification. Methods The case...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ANZ journal of surgery 2023-05, Vol.93 (5), p.1306-1313 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Post‐cholecystectomy, benign biliary strictures are challenging for both patients and surgeons. Bismuth classified benign biliary strictures into 5 types. This study aimed to review these isolated hepatic duct strictures which were not included in Bismuth classification.
Methods
The case records of all patients who presented with post‐cholecystectomy benign biliary strictures between January 2005 and December 2020 at our centre were reviewed. Data regarding demography, type of stricture, and treatment strategy were entered into the standard proforma.
Results
There were 242 patients [type I—3.7%, type II—41.7%, type III—38.0%, type IV—6.6%, and type V—7.8%]. Five (2.1%) patients did not fit the Bismuth classification and were the focus of this study. In each of these patients, an isolated hepatic duct stricture (first‐or second‐order hepatic duct) was present, with no involvement of the common hepatic duct or hilar confluence.
Conclusions
The addition of isolated hepatic duct stricture [type VI] to the Bismuth classification will enhance the original classification, help in reporting and management of this sub‐set of patients.
All post‐cholecystectomy benign biliary strictures from 2005 to 2020 at our center were reviewed. Five patient with isolated hepatic duct stricture did not fit into the Bismuth classification. We propose this sub‐set as an expansion to the Bismuth classification. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1445-1433 1445-2197 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ans.18281 |