Effects of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adult type 1 diabetes patients with suboptimal glycaemic control: A multi‐centre randomized controlled trial

Aims To investigate whether intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring without alarms (intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM)) improves glycaemic control over capillary blood glucose monitoring (BGM) among adult type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients with suboptimal control. Materials and Me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews 2023-05, Vol.39 (4), p.e3614-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Yan, Jinhua, Zhou, Yongwen, Zheng, Xueying, Zheng, Mao, Lu, Jing, Luo, Sihui, Yang, Daizhi, Deng, Hongrong, Xu, Wen, Bi, Yan, Bao, Wei, Weng, Jianping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims To investigate whether intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring without alarms (intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM)) improves glycaemic control over capillary blood glucose monitoring (BGM) among adult type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients with suboptimal control. Materials and Methods Adults with T1DM and HbA1c between 7% and 10% were 1:1 randomized to use isCGM or BGM for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c levels after intervention. The secondary outcomes were the changes in sensor‐derived metrics. Results A total of 104 adults with T1DM (34.2 ± 12.2 years; M/F, 38/66) were randomized to the isCGM group (n = 54) and the BGM group (n = 50). After 24 weeks, HbA1c significantly decreased in the isCGM group (8.1 ± 0.7% to 7.5 ± 1.0%) and the BGM group (8.0 ± 0.8% to 7.7 ± 1.0%) with between‐group differences of 0.3% (95% coefficient intervals, 0.0%–0.6%; P = 0.04). The percentage of HbA1c reduction over 1.0% and 1.5% was significantly higher in the isCGM group with adjusted odds ratios of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.1–5.5; P = 0.03) and 3.2 (95% CI: 1.1–9.0; P = 0.03). Mean time‐in‐range 70–180 mg/dl (TIR) in the isCGM group significantly increased (from 58.5 ± 13.0% to 63.0 ± 12.6%), whereas mean TIR was similar in the BGM group (from 58.0 ± 14.6% to 57.5 ± 14.5%). Time spent in hyperglycemia reduced more in the isCGM group and time spent in hypoglycemia did not change significantly in both groups. Conclusions Among adult T1DM patients with suboptimal glycaemic control, compared with BGM, isCGM use resulted in a statistically significant improvement in glycaemic control after 24‐week intervention. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier (NCT03522870)
ISSN:1520-7552
1520-7560
DOI:10.1002/dmrr.3614