Carbon–Carbon Linked Organic Frameworks: An Explicit Summary and Analysis

Organic frameworks with carbon–carbon (CC) linkage are an important class of materials owing to their outstanding chemical stability and extended π‐electron delocalization resulting in unique optoelectronic properties. In the first part of this review article, the design principles for the bottom‐u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Macromolecular rapid communications. 2023-04, Vol.44 (8), p.e2200950-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Nath, Satyapriya, Puthukkudi, Adithyan, Mohapatra, Jeebanjyoti, Bommakanti, Suresh, Chandrasekhar, Naisa, Biswal, Bishnu P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Organic frameworks with carbon–carbon (CC) linkage are an important class of materials owing to their outstanding chemical stability and extended π‐electron delocalization resulting in unique optoelectronic properties. In the first part of this review article, the design principles for the bottom‐up synthesis of 2D and 3D sp/sp2 CC linked organic frameworks are summarized. Representative reaction methodologies, such as Knoevenagel condensation, Aldol condensation, Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reaction, Wittig reaction, and coupling reactions (Ullmann, Suzuki, Heck, Yamamoto, etc.) are included. This is discussed in the context of their reaction mechanism, reaction dynamics, and whether and why resulting in an amorphous or crystalline product. This is followed by a discussion of different state‐of‐the art bottom‐up synthesis methodologies, like solvothermal, interfacial, and solid‐state synthesis. In the second part, the structure–property relationships in CC linked organic frameworks with representative examples of organocatalysis, photo(electro)catalysis, energy storage and conversion, magnetism, and molecular storage and separation are analyzed. The importance of linkage type, building blocks, topology, and crystallinity of the framework material in connection with the structure–property relationship is highlighted. Finally, brief concluding remarks are presented based on the key development of bottom‐up synthetic methods and provide perspectives for future development in this field. This review emphasizes the design principles, synthesis‐reaction dynamics, and structure–property relationships of sp/sp2 CC‐linked crystalline, and amorphous organic frameworks. The framework structures, built‐in functions, and properties are covered. A fine correlation between the choice of monomers and intrinsic properties is presented in a harmonic manner.
ISSN:1022-1336
1521-3927
DOI:10.1002/marc.202200950