Concurrent validity and reliability of a mobile iOS application used to assess calf raise test kinematics
Background:Calf raise test (CRT) is used in rehabilitation and sports medicine to evaluate calf muscle function. The Calf Raise application (CRapp) uses computer-vision algorithms to objectively measure CRT outcomes and replicate laboratory-based metrics that are difficult to measure clinically. Obj...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Musculoskeletal science & practice 2023-02, Vol.63, p.102711-102711, Article 102711 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:Calf raise test (CRT) is used in rehabilitation and sports medicine to evaluate calf muscle function. The Calf Raise application (CRapp) uses computer-vision algorithms to objectively measure CRT outcomes and replicate laboratory-based metrics that are difficult to measure clinically.
Objective:To validate the CRapp by examining its concurrent validity and agreement levels against laboratory-based equipment, and its intra- and inter-rater reliability.
Design:Observational cross-sectional validation study.
CRT outcomes (i.e., repetitions, positive work, total height, peak height, fatigue index, and peak power) were assessed in thirteen individuals (6 males, 7 females) on three occasions on both legs using the CRapp, 3D motion capture, and force plate simultaneously. Data were extracted from two markers: below lateral malleolus (n = 77) and on the heel (n = 77). Concurrent validity and agreement were determined from 154 data files using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,k), typical errors expressed as coefficient of variations (CV), and Bland-Altman plots to assess biases and precision. Reliability was assessed using ICC3,1 and CV values.
Validity of CRapp outcomes was good to excellent across measures for both markers (mean ICC ≥0.878), precision plots showing good agreement and precision. CV ranged from 0% (repetitions) to 33.3% (fatigue index) and were on average better for the lateral malleolus marker. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were excellent (ICC≥0.949, CV ≤ 5.6%).
Conclusion:CRapp is valid and reliable within and between users for measuring CRT outcomes in healthy adults. CRapp provides a tool to objectivise CRT outcomes in research and practice, aligning with recent advances in mobile technologies and their increased use in healthcare.
•CRapp uses computer vision algorithms to quantify plantarflexion function. (74).•CRapp has good to excellent validity and reliability. (53).•Marker below lateral malleolus is recommended over a heel marker. (66).•Researchers and clinicians can use the CRapp with confidence. (61). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2468-7812 2468-7812 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102711 |