Potential for remote vital sign monitoring to improve hospital patient sleep: A feasibility study
•For low-acuity inpatients, vital sign monitoring devices may decrease overnight patient disruptions, streamline nursing workflow, and decrease spread of infection in the hospital.•Patients and nurses feel positively toward the use of wearable vital sign monitoring devices on low-acuity wards in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Ireland), 2023-02, Vol.170, p.104970-104970, Article 104970 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •For low-acuity inpatients, vital sign monitoring devices may decrease overnight patient disruptions, streamline nursing workflow, and decrease spread of infection in the hospital.•Patients and nurses feel positively toward the use of wearable vital sign monitoring devices on low-acuity wards in the hospital.•As a representative product, the vital sign monitoring device we piloted had neutral patient comfort scores as well as issues with data streaming and concordance with nurse-collected vital signs.•Vital sign monitoring devices may not be ready to replace standard of care vital sign collection overnight.
Even low-acuity patients suffer from disrupted sleep in the hospital in part due to routine overnight vital sign (VS) checks. When invasive monitoring is not needed, vital sign monitoring devices (VSMDs) similar to consumer-grade health monitors may play a role in promoting sleep, which can aid healing and recovery.
We provided one VSMD to neuroscience ward patients during their hospital stays and used surveys to assess patient and nurse attitudes toward the device and the impact of the device on patient comfort. We also compared VSMD-streamed vS data to nurse-recorded vS data in the chart to evaluate the consistency of data streaming and data concordance between the device and nurse-collected vital sign values.
21 patients and 15 nurses enrolled. Overall, patients and nurses responded positively to the device and patients preferred wearing the device to receiving manual vital checks overnight. The most common device-related cause of sleep disruption per patients was device weight (29%). Device vS were concordant with nurse vS on average but there was significant variance in agreement between nurse and device values.
Patients and nurses feel positively about the use of VSMDs and their use in the hospital. The device we tested may be limited in its sleep promotion by its weight and patient comfort assessment. Further research is needed to assess the precision of the device in measuring vital signs when used in a clinical setting. Future studies should compare VSMD models and assess their impacts on patient sleep in the absence of manual vS checks overnight.
Funding provided by the Sara & Evan Williams Foundation Endowed Neurohospitalist Chair at UCSF. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1386-5056 1872-8243 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104970 |