The clinical utility of plasma and urine metanephrines in hypertensive emergency
Introduction Metanephrines (MTNs) are metabolites of catecholamines and are constantly produced in high amounts by pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). Marked MTN elevations (> 3 times the upper limit of normal [ULN]) are highly suggestive of PPGL. The frequency of marked MTN elevations...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hormones (Athens, Greece) Greece), 2023-03, Vol.22 (1), p.121-130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Metanephrines (MTNs) are metabolites of catecholamines and are constantly produced in high amounts by pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). Marked MTN elevations (> 3 times the upper limit of normal [ULN]) are highly suggestive of PPGL. The frequency of marked MTN elevations in non-PPGL hypertensive emergencies (HTNEs) is unknown.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed plasma free metanephrine (PMTN) and 24-h urinary fractionated metanephrine (UMTN) levels in 48 consecutive patients (59.7 ± 15.6 years; 48% female; BMI: 31 ± 9.7 kg/m
2
) hospitalized for HTNE, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 120 mmHg with end-organ damage. PMTNs were measured in 47 patients, UMTNs were measured in 16 patients, and both PMTNs and UMTNs were measured in 15 patients.
Results
PMTN/UMTN levels were not associated with SBP/DBP, comorbidities, end-organ damage, or interfering medications, the exception being that plasma normetanephrines (PNMNs) were significantly associated with comorbidities (Adj.
R
2
= 0.16;
p
= 0.04) and interfering medications (Adj.
R
2
= 0.15;
p
= 0.03), although with weak correlation. Marked MTN (specifically PNMN) elevations (647, 521, and 453 pg/mL; normal ≤ 148 pg/mL) were noted in only three patients (6%).
Discussion
Marked MTN elevations in HTNE are uncommon. Therefore, we recommend against measuring MTN in the setting of an apparent precipitating cause of HTNE to avoid unnecessary testing and imaging. Testing for MTN in HTNE should be pursued only when there is no clear precipitating cause and in cases where there is strong underlying clinical suspicion for PPGL. However, should testing be performed, marked MTN elevations should not be disregarded as being a commonly occurring result of HTNE. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1109-3099 2520-8721 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s42000-022-00422-6 |