Analysis of Industry-Related Payments Among Physician Editors of Pathology Journals

Abstract Objectives Gender inequities in editorial board representation and physician compensation are well documented, but few studies have focused on how editors of journals are compensated. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we examined industry-related compensation (from 2014 to 2020) among...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of clinical pathology 2023-02, Vol.159 (2), p.172-180
Hauptverfasser: Jacobs, Jeremy W, Martin, Amarilis A, Larson, Allison R, Gehrie, Eric A, Silver, Julie K, Booth, Garrett S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives Gender inequities in editorial board representation and physician compensation are well documented, but few studies have focused on how editors of journals are compensated. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we examined industry-related compensation (from 2014 to 2020) among physician editors of 35 pathology journals using publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Database. Results Of the physician editors included, 135 (69.9%) were men and 58 (30.1%) were women. Similar percentages of men and women physicians who were eligible received payments (112/135 [83.0%] men and 51/58 [87.9%] women; P = .38, χ2 test). Of the total transfer of value ($211,192,532), 112 men received $192,727,555 (91.3%), and 51 women received $18,464,978 (8.7%). Mean total payment per person was $1,720,782 for men and $362,058 for women (P = .05). The payment range for men was $18-$47,568,400 and the range of payments for women was $31-$2,375,637. Conclusions The findings highlight significant gender inequities in industry-related payments to physician editors of pathology journals. The financial relationships of journal editors and industry deserve further study, particularly as they relate to advancing science and closing both workforce and patient care inequities.
ISSN:0002-9173
1943-7722
DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqac147