Does Ultrasound Guidance Provide Pain Relief During Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective To evaluate ultrasound guidance effect in pain relief during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Methods Four different databases were searched from inception till June 2022. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared transabdominal ultrasound guidance versus traditiona...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2023-07, Vol.42 (7), p.1401-1411
Hauptverfasser: Baradwan, Saeed, Alshahrani, Majed Saeed, Alnoury, Albaraa, Khadawardi, Khalid, Khan, Mahmoud Anis, Abdelkader, Rehab Abdelkhalek Ahmed, Saleh, Ola I., Galal, Heba Mohammed, Mohamed, Suzan Mohamed Abdelkareem, Abdelhakim, Ahmed Mohamed, Elgedawy, Asmaa M., Elbahie, Amira M., Gaber, Mostafa A., Magdy, Amr Ahmed, Shaheen, Kareem
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To evaluate ultrasound guidance effect in pain relief during intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Methods Four different databases were searched from inception till June 2022. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared transabdominal ultrasound guidance versus traditional non‐guided IUD insertion among women undergoing IUD placement for contraception. We used Revman software during performing our meta‐analysis. Our primary outcome was the pain score during IUD insertion as evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Our secondary outcomes were the procedure insertion time, satisfaction, and incidences of complications and misplaced IUDs. Results Seven RCTs were retrieved with a total number of 1267 patients. There was a significant reduction in the VAS pain score during IUD insertion among the ultrasound‐guided group (MD = −1.91, 95% CI [−3.08, −0.73], P = .001). The procedure insertion time was significantly shorter within the ultrasound guidance group compared with the control group (MD = −1.35, 95% CI [−1.81, −0.88], P 
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.1002/jum.16166