Accuracy of a Clinical Applicable Method for Prediction of VO2max Using Seismocardiography

Cardiorespiratory fitness measured as ˙VO max is considered an important variable in the risk prediction of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Non-exercise ˙VO max prediction models are applicable, but lack accuracy. Here a model for the prediction of ˙VO max using seismocardiography (S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of sports medicine 2023-07, Vol.44 (9), p.650-656
Hauptverfasser: Hansen, Mikkel Thunestvedt, Husted, Karina Louise Skov, Fogelstrøm, Mathilde, Rømer, Tue, Schmidt, Samuel Emil, Sørensen, Kasper, Helge, Jørn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cardiorespiratory fitness measured as ˙VO max is considered an important variable in the risk prediction of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Non-exercise ˙VO max prediction models are applicable, but lack accuracy. Here a model for the prediction of ˙VO max using seismocardiography (SCG) was investigated. 97 healthy participants (18-65 yrs., 51 females) underwent measurement of SCG at rest in the supine position combined with demographic data to predict ˙VO max before performing a graded exercise test (GET) on a cycle ergometer for determination of ˙VO max using pulmonary gas exchange measurements for comparison. Accuracy assessment revealed no significant difference between SCG and GET ˙VO max (mean±95% CI; 38.3±1.6 and 39.3±1.6 ml·min ·kg , respectively. P=0.075). Further, a Pearson correlation of r=0.73, a standard error of estimate (SEE) of 5.9 ml·min ·kg , and a coefficient of variation (CV) of 8±1% were found. The SCG ˙VO max showed higher accuracy, than the non-exercise model based on the FRIENDS study, when this was applied to the present population (bias=-3.7±1.3 ml·min ·kg , p
ISSN:0172-4622
1439-3964
DOI:10.1055/a-2004-4669