Plant community phylogeny responses to protections and its main drivers in boreal forests, China: General pattern and implications

Patterns of the phylogenetic structure have been broadly applied to predict community assembly processes. However, the distribution pattern of evolutionary diversity and its drivers under nature conservation are still poorly understood in boreal forests. Here, we investigated 1738 sampling plots and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2023-03, Vol.864, p.161151-161151, Article 161151
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Yanbo, Zhong, Zhaoliang, Jing, Lixin, Li, Qi, Wang, Huimei, Wang, Wenjie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Patterns of the phylogenetic structure have been broadly applied to predict community assembly processes. However, the distribution pattern of evolutionary diversity and its drivers under nature conservation are still poorly understood in boreal forests. Here, we investigated 1738 sampling plots and subplots from distinct protection intensities (PIs) zones in five representative National Nature Reserves (NNRs). Multiple comparisons, redundancy analysis, and linear mixed model were performed to identify the changes in community phylogeny across different PIs and NNRs and the drivers for these variations. Our results showed considerable plant community phylogeny variations in different NNRs. As indicated by SesMPD (standardized mean pairwise distance) and SesMNTD (standardized the mean nearest taxon distance), trees, shrubs, and herbs presented overdispersed, clustered, and random distribution patterns, respectively, in different PIs. Protection resulted in the phylogenetic structure between the nearest species of trees showing a more overdispersed pattern (p < 0.05). Protection decreased the phylogenetically clustered degree between the nearest species of shrubs (p > 0.05), while the herbs still maintained a random pattern. Community traits explained the most to phylogeny variation of different communities (24 %–71 %, p < 0.01), followed by geoclimatic factors (2 %–24 %) and conservation processes (1 %–21 %). The higher mean annual precipitation and under branch height at the lower latitude area accompanied the higher SesMPD and SesMNTD. The higher PIs attended with higher tree SesMPD, and the longer protection time resulted in higher shrub PSR (phylogenetic species richness) and PSV (phylogenetic species variability). Including the location of NNRs, community traits, and years of protection, rather than only emphasizing PI itself, could optimize community phylogenetic structure and preserve the evolutionary potential of biodiversity. [Display omitted] •Plant phylogeny responses to protection and its drivers were studied in 5 boreal forest Reserves.•Protection decreased relatedness between the nearest species of trees.•Conservation, biotic traits and geoclimates explained most phylogenetic changes.•UBH, MAP, and Lat were good predictors for tree, shrub and herb phylogenetic structure.•Optimizing community phylogeny requires multiple factors, rather than protection intensity alone.
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161151