A comparison of patient-reported outcomes among Canadian women having hysterectomies
Purpose Many indications for hysterectomy can negatively affect patients’ quality of life. This study uses patient-reported outcomes to measure changes in self-reported health among hysterectomy patients. Method A prospective cohort of 294 hysterectomy patients completed patient-reported outcomes pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality of life research 2023-03, Vol.32 (3), p.759-768 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Many indications for hysterectomy can negatively affect patients’ quality of life. This study uses patient-reported outcomes to measure changes in self-reported health among hysterectomy patients.
Method
A prospective cohort of 294 hysterectomy patients completed patient-reported outcomes preoperatively and six months postoperatively in Vancouver, Canada. Patient-reported outcomes measured pelvic health, sexual function, pain, and depression. Changes in health were compared with paired
t
-tests, and multi-variable regression analysis measured associations between patient and clinical factors with postoperative outcomes
Results
Many patients reported improvements in health. Unadjusted analysis found that 65% of participants reported less pelvic distress, 55% reported less pain, and 47% reported less depression symptoms postoperatively. Multivariable regression analysis found that poorer preoperative health was associated with poorer postoperative outcomes in all domains of health measured (
p
-value |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0962-9343 1573-2649 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11136-022-03326-5 |