Aneurysm Neck Overestimation has a Relatively Modest Impact on Simulated Hemodynamics

Introduction Overestimation of intracranial aneurysm neck width by 3D angiography is a recognized clinical problem, and has long been a concern for image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Recently, it was demonstrated that neck overestimation in 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) could be corr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular engineering and technology 2023-04, Vol.14 (2), p.252-263
Hauptverfasser: MacDonald, Daniel E., Cancelliere, Nicole M., Pereira, Vitor M., Steinman, David A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Overestimation of intracranial aneurysm neck width by 3D angiography is a recognized clinical problem, and has long been a concern for image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Recently, it was demonstrated that neck overestimation in 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) could be corrected via segmentation with upsampled resolution and gradient enhancement (SURGE). Our aim was to leverage this approach to determine whether and how neck overestimation actually impacts CFD-derived hemodynamics. Materials and Methods A subset of 17 cases having the largest neck errors from a consecutive clinical sample of 60 was segmented from 3DRA using both standard watershed and SURGE methods. High-fidelity, pulsatile CFD was performed, and a variety of scalar hemodynamic parameters that have been associated with aneurysm growth and/or rupture status were derived. Results With a few exceptions, flow and wall shear stress (WSS) patterns were qualitatively similar between neck-overestimated and corrected models. Sac-averaged WSS values were significantly lower after neck correction ( p  = 0.0005) but were highly correlated with their neck-overestimated counterparts ( R 2  = 0.98). Jet impingement was significantly more concentrated in the neck-corrected vs. -uncorrected models ( p  = 0.0011), and only moderately correlated ( R 2  = 0.61). Parameters quantifying velocity or WSS fluctuations were not significantly different after neck correction, but this reflected their poorer correlations ( R 2  
ISSN:1869-408X
1869-4098
DOI:10.1007/s13239-022-00652-0