Revisiting uncertainty as a felt sense of unsafety: The somatic error theory of intolerance of uncertainty
Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) has gained widespread interest as a construct of broad interest from both transdiagnostic and trans-situational perspectives. We have approached this article inspired by the curiosity, clinical observation, consideration of different theoretical perspectives, speculat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 2023-06, Vol.79, p.101827-101827, Article 101827 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) has gained widespread interest as a construct of broad interest from both transdiagnostic and trans-situational perspectives. We have approached this article inspired by the curiosity, clinical observation, consideration of different theoretical perspectives, speculation, optimism and indeed fun that can be seen in S. J. Rachman's work. We address some of what we know about IU before considering one way of conceptualizing IU from the standpoint of a felt sense or embodied experience.
In the first part, we start with Woody and Rachman's (1994) observations of people with GAD. Second, we consider some key findings from the literature. Third, we consider two important perspectives on uncertainty, namely, Brosschot et al.’s (2016, 2018) influential Generalized Unsafety Theory of Stress and uncertainty as an emotion.
In the second part, backing our clinical hunch about the importance of the felt sense of uncertainty, we consider IU from the perspective of interoception and the somatic error theory of anxiety (Khalsa & Feinstein, 2018). We propose the somatic error theory of intolerance of uncertainty, which places the experience of uncertainty at the heart of our understanding of intolerance of uncertainty. This is followed by predictions, unresolved questions, and potential clinical implications.
Finally, we revisit Woody and Rachman's (1994) suggestions for treatment as internalizing “a sense of safety in a range of circumstances (p. 750)” and update this from the perspective of the felt sense of uncertainty. We finish by suggesting that uncertainty can be tolerated, perhaps accepted, and even embraced.
•Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is transdiagnostic and trans-situational.•Woody and Rachman (1994) described people with GAD as “not knowing”.•Recent models emphasize the absence of safety rather than the presence of threat.•The somatic error theory of IU emphasizes the felt sense of uncertainty.•Uncertainty can be tolerated, perhaps accepted, and even embraced. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0005-7916 1873-7943 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101827 |