Optimizing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and prostate cancer grading accuracy

Purpose To assess the most efficient biopsy method to improve International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group accuracy with final pathology of the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen in the era of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-driven pathway. Methods A total of 753 patients diagn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of urology 2023-01, Vol.41 (1), p.77-84
Hauptverfasser: Diamand, Romain, Peltier, Alexandre, Roche, Jean-Baptiste, Lievore, Elena, Lacetera, Vito, Chiacchio, Giuseppe, Beatrici, Valerio, Mastroianni, Riccardo, Simone, Giuseppe, Windisch, Olivier, Benamran, Daniel, Fourcade, Alexandre, Nguyen, Truong An, Fournier, Georges, Fiard, Gaelle, Ploussard, Guillaume, Roumeguère, Thierry, Albisinni, Simone
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To assess the most efficient biopsy method to improve International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group accuracy with final pathology of the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen in the era of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-driven pathway. Methods A total of 753 patients diagnosed by transrectal MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies (namely “standard method”), treated by RP, between 2016 and 2021 were evaluated. Biopsy methods included MRI-targeted biopsy, side-specific systematic biopsies relative to index MRI lesion and combination of both. Number of MRI-targeted biopsy cores and positive cores needed per index MRI lesion were assessed. Multivariable analysis was performed to analyze predictive factors of upgrading using MRI targeted and ipsilateral systematic biopsies method. Results Overall, ISUP grade group accuracy varied among biopsy methods with upgrading rate of 35%, 49%, 27%, and 24% for MRI targeted, systematic, MRI targeted and ipsilateral systematic biopsies and standard methods, respectively ( p  
ISSN:1433-8726
0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-022-04244-4