Efficacy and safety of HIFU in combination with TACE in unresectable pediatric HB: A randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial

Hepatoblastoma (HB) is the most common liver tumor in children, and the main treatment for HB is currently surgery. Studies have shown that transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has significant efficacy, but there are relatively few st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2022-12, Vol.101 (48), p.e32022-e32022
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Xinliang, He, Xiaobing, Jiang, Han
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Hepatoblastoma (HB) is the most common liver tumor in children, and the main treatment for HB is currently surgery. Studies have shown that transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has significant efficacy, but there are relatively few studies on TACE combined with HIFU in China. To investigate the effect of using HIFU combined with TACE on patients' liver function impairment and immune function in pediatric HB patients and to analyze the effectiveness and safety. The clinical data of 110 unresectable pediatric HB patients treated in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2021 were selected as the subjects and divided into 2 groups. The comparison group was treated with TACE, and the combination group was treated with HIFU on the basis of the comparison group. The differences in immune function, survival, treatment side effects and clinical efficacy between the 2 groups were observed. In the combined group, the 1-year survival rate was 100%, the 3-year survival rate was 84.0%, the 5-year survival rate was 16.0%; while in comparison group, it was 82%, 16%, 0%, respectively. The ratio of CD4+/CD8+ in the combined group were significantly higher than in the comparison group after treatment (P 
ISSN:1536-5964
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000032022