Anatomic misconceptions regarding the agger nasi cell: A preliminary analysis utilizing endoscopic anatomic dissection and three‐dimensional computed tomography

The agger nasi cell is a key anatomic landmark in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. However, discord amongst authors regarding anatomic definition and prevalence raises questions of its suitability as a surgical landmark. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the agger nasi cell using rad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-03, Vol.36 (2), p.267-276
Hauptverfasser: Bolger, William E., Ishii, Masaru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The agger nasi cell is a key anatomic landmark in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. However, discord amongst authors regarding anatomic definition and prevalence raises questions of its suitability as a surgical landmark. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the agger nasi cell using radiographic imaging correlated with endoscopic anatomic dissection to consider the cell's role as a surgical landmark and to explore if three‐dimensional computed tomography (3D‐CT) technology can provide enhanced insight into this anatomy. CT scans of 11 cadaveric sinonasal complexes were studied using triplanar CT or 3D‐CT scanning with stereoscopic 3D imaging. Endoscopic dissections were performed and video recorded. Attention was given to identify agger nasi pneumatization and its origin. Pneumatization of the agger nasi region was noted in 4/11 cases (36.4%) (in two cases the pneumatization arose from the frontal recess, in two from a true agger nasi cell). The agger nasi region appeared as solid unpneumatized bone in 4/11 cases (36.4%). In 3/11 cases (27.3%) limited pneumatization was noted, bordering on but not pneumatizing the agger nasi proper. It may be confusing for otolaryngologic surgeons in training to rely on the “agger nasi cell” as a surgical landmark due to misconceptions regarding the anatomy, prevalence and anatomic definitions. Using standard CT scans to teach anatomy may have shortcomings as compared to the gold standard of surgical dissection. However, new 3D‐CT holds promise to more accurately reflect small microanatomic features and provide an improved road map of a patient's anatomy in surgery.
ISSN:0897-3806
1098-2353
DOI:10.1002/ca.23982