External validation of a clinical prediction model in multiple sclerosis

Background: Timely initiation of disease modifying therapy is crucial for managing multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: We aimed to validate a previously published predictive model of individual treatment response using a non-overlapping cohort from the Middle East. Methods: We interrogated the MSBas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Multiple sclerosis 2023-02, Vol.29 (2), p.261-269
Hauptverfasser: Moradi, Nahid, Sharmin, Sifat, Malpas, Charles B, Shaygannejad, Vahid, Terzi, Murat, Boz, Cavit, Yamout, Bassem, Khoury, Samia J, Turkoglu, Recai, Karabudak, Rana, Shalaby, Nevin, Soysal, Aysun, Altıntaş, Ayşe, Inshasi, Jihad, Al-Harbi, Talal, Alroughani, Raed, Kalincik, Tomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Timely initiation of disease modifying therapy is crucial for managing multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: We aimed to validate a previously published predictive model of individual treatment response using a non-overlapping cohort from the Middle East. Methods: We interrogated the MSBase registry for patients who were not included in the initial model development. These patients had relapsing MS or clinically isolated syndrome, a recorded date of disease onset, disability and dates of disease modifying therapy, with sufficient follow-up pre- and post-baseline. Baseline was the visit at which a new disease modifying therapy was initiated, and which served as the start of the predicted period. The original models were used to translate clinical information into three principal components and to predict probability of relapses, disability worsening or improvement, conversion to secondary progressive MS and treatment discontinuation as well as changes in the area under disability-time curve (ΔAUC). Prediction accuracy was assessed using the criteria published previously. Results: The models performed well for predicting the risk of disability worsening and improvement (accuracy: 81%–96%) and performed moderately well for predicting the risk of relapses (accuracy: 73%–91%). The predictions for ΔAUC and risk of treatment discontinuation were suboptimal (accuracy 
ISSN:1352-4585
1477-0970
DOI:10.1177/13524585221136036