Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance derived global longitudinal strain analysis in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) for evaluating dilated cardiomyopathy patients has been addressed in studies with contradictory results. We therefore performed the first systematic review evaluating evidence on the prognostic value of CMR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 2022-12, Vol.38 (12), p.2707-2721
Hauptverfasser: Fong, Lucas Chun Wah, Lee, Nicholas Ho Cheung, Poon, Jessica Wai Ling, Chin, Calvin W. L., He, Baroc, Luo, Lin, Chen, Catherine, Wan, Eric Yuk Fai, Pennell, Dudley J., Mohiaddin, Raad, Ng, Ming-Yen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) for evaluating dilated cardiomyopathy patients has been addressed in studies with contradictory results. We therefore performed the first systematic review evaluating evidence on the prognostic value of CMR derived LV-GLS for ischaemic (IDCM) and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NDCM) patients. Systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020171582) identified studies up to January 2021 that measured LV-GLS for predicting major adverse cardiac events among dilated cardiomyopathy patients. Studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed by two independent reviewers. 2099 studies were screened. Three prospective and three retrospective observational studies comprising of 1758 patients (29% IDCM patients; 71% NDCM patients) with a weighted mean follow up of 3 years (SD = 1 year) were identified. All six studies included mortality in the primary composite outcome. LV-GLS was associated with increase primary composite outcome among mild to moderately impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) IDCM and NDCM patients (> 30%) in univariable and multivariable analysis. Association was lost among severely impaired LVEF patients (
ISSN:1875-8312
1569-5794
1875-8312
1573-0743
DOI:10.1007/s10554-022-02679-9