Concomitant Patellar Tendon Tear (PTT) with Cruciate and/ Collateral ligament injury (Multi- Ligamentous Knee Injury –MLKI) and new pathoanatomical -Ganga PTT classification aids to strategize treatment options
•The complex multi-ligament knee injury needs a systematic approach.•Patellar tendon tear associated with MLKI, restoration of extensor apparatus precedes other ligament reconstructions.•Further, longer and supervised rehabilitation is needed for adequate recovery. Concomitant patellar tendon (PT) t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Injury 2023-02, Vol.54 (2), p.712-721 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •The complex multi-ligament knee injury needs a systematic approach.•Patellar tendon tear associated with MLKI, restoration of extensor apparatus precedes other ligament reconstructions.•Further, longer and supervised rehabilitation is needed for adequate recovery.
Concomitant patellar tendon (PT) tear with cruciate or multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKI) following high-velocity injury requires a systematic approach.
The study is a retrospective case series of patients (2008–2019) with concomitant PT ligament injury with cruciate or collateral ligament injury (MLKI), including bony avulsion injuries. Isolated cruciate and MLKI without patellar tendon tears are excluded. N = 32 patients (1 female and 31 male) are divided into two groups, Group 1 (11 patients) with PT tear and ACL tear and group 2 (21 patients) with PT tear and MLKIs. Patients were taken up for a single stage in types 1,2,3 and staged repair with reconstruction for types 4,5 of our new classification. All the patients are followed up regularly, and IKDC and Lyshom's score and objective radiological stress x-rays taken at each follow-up
Incidence of PTT combined injuries among all knee ligament injuries is 0.57%. The mean age was 35.09+/-11.96 SD(group1) and 36.55+/-11.89 SD(group2). The average follow-up was 34.45 months +/- 12.86SD (group 1) and 35.3 months +/- 15.75 SD (group2). Mean post-operative Lysholm score and IKDC score of group 1 and group 2 improvement was statistically significant p-value |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-1383 1879-0267 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.injury.2022.10.031 |