Hyperthermic Mitomycin C in Intermediate-risk Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of the HIVEC-1 Trial

A randomised trial compared normothermic intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) versus hyperthermic intravesical therapy (HIVEC) with MMC instilled for 30 and 60 min in patients with intermediate-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. MMC delivered with HIVEC was well tolerated, but there was no differenc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology oncology 2023-02, Vol.6 (1), p.58-66
Hauptverfasser: Angulo, Javier C., Álvarez-Ossorio, José L., Domínguez-Escrig, José L., Moyano, José L., Sousa, Alejandro, Fernández, Jesús M., Gómez-Veiga, Francisco, Unda, Miguel, Carballido, Joaquín, Carrero, Victor, Fernandez-Aparicio, Tomás, García de Jalón, Ángel, Solsona, Eduardo, Inman, Brant, Palou, Joan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A randomised trial compared normothermic intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) versus hyperthermic intravesical therapy (HIVEC) with MMC instilled for 30 and 60 min in patients with intermediate-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. MMC delivered with HIVEC was well tolerated, but there was no difference in 24-mo recurrence-free survival. Optimising therapeutic strategies of intermediate-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (IR-NMIBC) is needed. To compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) with adjuvant intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) at normothermia or hyperthermia using the COMBAT bladder recirculation system at 43 °C for 30 and 60 min. A prospective open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial (HIVEC-1) accrued across 13 centres between 2014 and 2020 in Spain. After complete transurethral resection of the bladder and immediate postoperative MMC instillation, patients with IR-NMIBC were randomised (1:1:1) to four weekly followed by three monthly 40-mg MMC instillations at normothermia (control; n = 106), 43 °C for 30 min (n = 107), or 43 °C for 60 min (n = 106) were investigated. Therapeutic compliance was defined as four or more instillations. The primary outcome was RFS at 24 mo in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. The secondary outcomes included progression-free survival at 24 mo, safety outcome measures, and changes in health-related quality of life. Log-rank, Fisher, χ2, and analysis of variance tests were used. The ITT 24-mo RFS was 77% for control, 82% for 43 °C-30 min, and 80% for 43 °C–60 min (p = 0.6). The PP 24-mo RFS was 77% for control, 83% for 43 °C–30 min, and 80% for 43 °C-60 min (p = 0.59). Six patients progressed to muscle-invasive disease in the ITT population (four in the control, 43 °C–30 min, and 43 °C–60 min groups each) and four in the PP population (all controls). Serious adverse events occurred in 26 patients (8.1%), and we were unable to demonstrate a difference between groups (p = 0.5). Adverse events, mainly dysuria and spasms, occurred in 124 patients (33% in control, 35% in 43 °C–30 min, and 48% in 43 °C–60 min; p = 0.05). The total International Prostate Symptom Score worsened by 1.2 ± 7.3 points, similarly across groups (p = 0.29). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Bladder domains and indexes showed no significant change. Four-month adjuvant hyperthermic MMC using the COMBAT system for 30 and 60 min in IR-NMIBC is well tolerated, but we did not find it to be superior to normothermic M
ISSN:2588-9311
2588-9311
DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2022.10.008