Potential of Lemna minor and Eichhornia crassipes for the phytoremediation of water contaminated with Nickel (II)
Phytoextraction of Nickel (II) in water by two types of aquatic macrophytes ( Lemna minor and Eichhornia crassipes ) was investigated using synthetic aqueous solutions of NiSO 4 at concentrations of 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 mg/L. The toxic effects of nickel salt in plants were evaluated through the presence...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2023-01, Vol.195 (1), p.119-119, Article 119 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 119 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 119 |
| container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| container_volume | 195 |
| creator | Moreno-Rubio, Nataly Ortega-Villamizar, Daniela Marimon-Bolívar, Wilfredo Bustillo-Lecompte, Ciro Tejeda-Benítez, Lesly Patricia |
| description | Phytoextraction of Nickel (II) in water by two types of aquatic macrophytes (
Lemna minor
and
Eichhornia crassipes
) was investigated using synthetic aqueous solutions of NiSO
4
at concentrations of 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 mg/L. The toxic effects of nickel salt in plants were evaluated through the presence of necrosis and chlorosis. The bioconcentration factor, Nickel (II) removal efficiency and kinetics of removal were also calculated. Results of this study show bioconcentration factors higher than 1000, which categorize
L. minor
and
E. crassipes
as hyperaccumulators. Besides,
L. minor
presented a removal percentage higher than 68%, compared to
E. crassipes
that did not exceed 50% in any of the three concentrations studied. However,
E. crassipes
showed better resistance to the effects of nickel and obtained a greater removal capacity during the phytoremediation process that lasted for 10 days. In contrast,
L. minor
suffered necrosis and chlorosis in a concentration-dependent way. Consequently, both macrophytes are sustainable alternatives for nickel removal from contaminated water. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-022-10688-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738195331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2738195331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-b2571197ef0d7171de5883828b0a8a5d149242dd3329b39f72a99c1e6035f1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVpoG6SP9CTIJf0sIlG8q6kYwj5MJg0h9yFrJ3tKt2VHEkm5N9XrgOBHnIaDXreh4GXkB_ALoAxeZmBdR00jPOmvpRqxBeygFaKhutWfyULBp1sOtHpb-R7zs-MMS2XekFeHmPBULydaBzoGudg6exDTNSGnt54N44xBW-pSzZnv8VMh_pZRqTb8a3EhDP23hYfw17wagsm6mIotlrq0tNXX0b64N0fnOj5avXzhBwNdsp4-j6PydPtzdP1fbP-dbe6vlo3jitemg1vJYCWOLBegoQeW6WE4mrDrLJtD0vNl7zvheB6I_QgudXaAXZMtAM4cUzOD9ptii87zMXMPjucJhsw7rLhUijQrRBQ0bP_0Oe4S6Eet6ck75YtiErxA-VSzDnhYLbJzza9GWBmX4I5lGBqCeZfCWYfEodQrnD4jelD_UnqL2DaiWU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2737264513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential of Lemna minor and Eichhornia crassipes for the phytoremediation of water contaminated with Nickel (II)</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Moreno-Rubio, Nataly ; Ortega-Villamizar, Daniela ; Marimon-Bolívar, Wilfredo ; Bustillo-Lecompte, Ciro ; Tejeda-Benítez, Lesly Patricia</creator><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Rubio, Nataly ; Ortega-Villamizar, Daniela ; Marimon-Bolívar, Wilfredo ; Bustillo-Lecompte, Ciro ; Tejeda-Benítez, Lesly Patricia</creatorcontrib><description>Phytoextraction of Nickel (II) in water by two types of aquatic macrophytes (
Lemna minor
and
Eichhornia crassipes
) was investigated using synthetic aqueous solutions of NiSO
4
at concentrations of 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 mg/L. The toxic effects of nickel salt in plants were evaluated through the presence of necrosis and chlorosis. The bioconcentration factor, Nickel (II) removal efficiency and kinetics of removal were also calculated. Results of this study show bioconcentration factors higher than 1000, which categorize
L. minor
and
E. crassipes
as hyperaccumulators. Besides,
L. minor
presented a removal percentage higher than 68%, compared to
E. crassipes
that did not exceed 50% in any of the three concentrations studied. However,
E. crassipes
showed better resistance to the effects of nickel and obtained a greater removal capacity during the phytoremediation process that lasted for 10 days. In contrast,
L. minor
suffered necrosis and chlorosis in a concentration-dependent way. Consequently, both macrophytes are sustainable alternatives for nickel removal from contaminated water.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10688-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aquatic plants ; Aqueous solutions ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Bioaccumulation ; Biological magnification ; Bioremediation ; Chlorosis ; Duckweed ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Eichhornia crassipes ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental science ; Freshwater plants ; Kinetics ; Lemna minor ; Macrophytes ; Mathematical analysis ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Necrosis ; Nickel ; Phytoremediation ; Removal ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023-01, Vol.195 (1), p.119-119, Article 119</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-b2571197ef0d7171de5883828b0a8a5d149242dd3329b39f72a99c1e6035f1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-b2571197ef0d7171de5883828b0a8a5d149242dd3329b39f72a99c1e6035f1c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3240-917X ; 0000-0002-6947-2220 ; 0000-0001-5262-7743</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-022-10688-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-022-10688-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Rubio, Nataly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega-Villamizar, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marimon-Bolívar, Wilfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustillo-Lecompte, Ciro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejeda-Benítez, Lesly Patricia</creatorcontrib><title>Potential of Lemna minor and Eichhornia crassipes for the phytoremediation of water contaminated with Nickel (II)</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>Phytoextraction of Nickel (II) in water by two types of aquatic macrophytes (
Lemna minor
and
Eichhornia crassipes
) was investigated using synthetic aqueous solutions of NiSO
4
at concentrations of 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 mg/L. The toxic effects of nickel salt in plants were evaluated through the presence of necrosis and chlorosis. The bioconcentration factor, Nickel (II) removal efficiency and kinetics of removal were also calculated. Results of this study show bioconcentration factors higher than 1000, which categorize
L. minor
and
E. crassipes
as hyperaccumulators. Besides,
L. minor
presented a removal percentage higher than 68%, compared to
E. crassipes
that did not exceed 50% in any of the three concentrations studied. However,
E. crassipes
showed better resistance to the effects of nickel and obtained a greater removal capacity during the phytoremediation process that lasted for 10 days. In contrast,
L. minor
suffered necrosis and chlorosis in a concentration-dependent way. Consequently, both macrophytes are sustainable alternatives for nickel removal from contaminated water.</description><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Aqueous solutions</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Biological magnification</subject><subject>Bioremediation</subject><subject>Chlorosis</subject><subject>Duckweed</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Eichhornia crassipes</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Freshwater plants</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Lemna minor</subject><subject>Macrophytes</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Necrosis</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>Phytoremediation</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVpoG6SP9CTIJf0sIlG8q6kYwj5MJg0h9yFrJ3tKt2VHEkm5N9XrgOBHnIaDXreh4GXkB_ALoAxeZmBdR00jPOmvpRqxBeygFaKhutWfyULBp1sOtHpb-R7zs-MMS2XekFeHmPBULydaBzoGudg6exDTNSGnt54N44xBW-pSzZnv8VMh_pZRqTb8a3EhDP23hYfw17wagsm6mIotlrq0tNXX0b64N0fnOj5avXzhBwNdsp4-j6PydPtzdP1fbP-dbe6vlo3jitemg1vJYCWOLBegoQeW6WE4mrDrLJtD0vNl7zvheB6I_QgudXaAXZMtAM4cUzOD9ptii87zMXMPjucJhsw7rLhUijQrRBQ0bP_0Oe4S6Eet6ck75YtiErxA-VSzDnhYLbJzza9GWBmX4I5lGBqCeZfCWYfEodQrnD4jelD_UnqL2DaiWU</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Moreno-Rubio, Nataly</creator><creator>Ortega-Villamizar, Daniela</creator><creator>Marimon-Bolívar, Wilfredo</creator><creator>Bustillo-Lecompte, Ciro</creator><creator>Tejeda-Benítez, Lesly Patricia</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-917X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-2220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5262-7743</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Potential of Lemna minor and Eichhornia crassipes for the phytoremediation of water contaminated with Nickel (II)</title><author>Moreno-Rubio, Nataly ; Ortega-Villamizar, Daniela ; Marimon-Bolívar, Wilfredo ; Bustillo-Lecompte, Ciro ; Tejeda-Benítez, Lesly Patricia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-b2571197ef0d7171de5883828b0a8a5d149242dd3329b39f72a99c1e6035f1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Aqueous solutions</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Biological magnification</topic><topic>Bioremediation</topic><topic>Chlorosis</topic><topic>Duckweed</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Eichhornia crassipes</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Freshwater plants</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Lemna minor</topic><topic>Macrophytes</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Necrosis</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>Phytoremediation</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Rubio, Nataly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega-Villamizar, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marimon-Bolívar, Wilfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustillo-Lecompte, Ciro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tejeda-Benítez, Lesly Patricia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moreno-Rubio, Nataly</au><au>Ortega-Villamizar, Daniela</au><au>Marimon-Bolívar, Wilfredo</au><au>Bustillo-Lecompte, Ciro</au><au>Tejeda-Benítez, Lesly Patricia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential of Lemna minor and Eichhornia crassipes for the phytoremediation of water contaminated with Nickel (II)</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>119-119</pages><artnum>119</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>Phytoextraction of Nickel (II) in water by two types of aquatic macrophytes (
Lemna minor
and
Eichhornia crassipes
) was investigated using synthetic aqueous solutions of NiSO
4
at concentrations of 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 mg/L. The toxic effects of nickel salt in plants were evaluated through the presence of necrosis and chlorosis. The bioconcentration factor, Nickel (II) removal efficiency and kinetics of removal were also calculated. Results of this study show bioconcentration factors higher than 1000, which categorize
L. minor
and
E. crassipes
as hyperaccumulators. Besides,
L. minor
presented a removal percentage higher than 68%, compared to
E. crassipes
that did not exceed 50% in any of the three concentrations studied. However,
E. crassipes
showed better resistance to the effects of nickel and obtained a greater removal capacity during the phytoremediation process that lasted for 10 days. In contrast,
L. minor
suffered necrosis and chlorosis in a concentration-dependent way. Consequently, both macrophytes are sustainable alternatives for nickel removal from contaminated water.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10661-022-10688-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-917X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-2220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5262-7743</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
| ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023-01, Vol.195 (1), p.119-119, Article 119 |
| issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2738195331 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Aquatic plants Aqueous solutions Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Bioaccumulation Biological magnification Bioremediation Chlorosis Duckweed Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecotoxicology Eichhornia crassipes Environment Environmental Management Environmental monitoring Environmental science Freshwater plants Kinetics Lemna minor Macrophytes Mathematical analysis Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Necrosis Nickel Phytoremediation Removal Water pollution |
| title | Potential of Lemna minor and Eichhornia crassipes for the phytoremediation of water contaminated with Nickel (II) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T10%3A59%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20of%20Lemna%20minor%20and%20Eichhornia%20crassipes%20for%20the%20phytoremediation%20of%20water%20contaminated%20with%20Nickel%20(II)&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Moreno-Rubio,%20Nataly&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=119-119&rft.artnum=119&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-022-10688-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2738195331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2737264513&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |