Potential of Lemna minor and Eichhornia crassipes for the phytoremediation of water contaminated with Nickel (II)
Phytoextraction of Nickel (II) in water by two types of aquatic macrophytes ( Lemna minor and Eichhornia crassipes ) was investigated using synthetic aqueous solutions of NiSO 4 at concentrations of 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 mg/L. The toxic effects of nickel salt in plants were evaluated through the presence...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2023-01, Vol.195 (1), p.119-119, Article 119 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Phytoextraction of Nickel (II) in water by two types of aquatic macrophytes (
Lemna minor
and
Eichhornia crassipes
) was investigated using synthetic aqueous solutions of NiSO
4
at concentrations of 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 mg/L. The toxic effects of nickel salt in plants were evaluated through the presence of necrosis and chlorosis. The bioconcentration factor, Nickel (II) removal efficiency and kinetics of removal were also calculated. Results of this study show bioconcentration factors higher than 1000, which categorize
L. minor
and
E. crassipes
as hyperaccumulators. Besides,
L. minor
presented a removal percentage higher than 68%, compared to
E. crassipes
that did not exceed 50% in any of the three concentrations studied. However,
E. crassipes
showed better resistance to the effects of nickel and obtained a greater removal capacity during the phytoremediation process that lasted for 10 days. In contrast,
L. minor
suffered necrosis and chlorosis in a concentration-dependent way. Consequently, both macrophytes are sustainable alternatives for nickel removal from contaminated water. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10661-022-10688-3 |