Unexplained septic shock after colonoscopy with polyethylene glycol preparation in a young adult: A case report
BACKGROUNDColonoscopy has become a routine physical examination as people's health awareness has increased. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is greatly used in bowel preparation before colonoscopy due to its price and safety advantages. Septic shock after colonoscopy with PEG preparation is extremely...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of clinical cases 2022, Vol.10 (31), p.11652-11657 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUNDColonoscopy has become a routine physical examination as people's health awareness has increased. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is greatly used in bowel preparation before colonoscopy due to its price and safety advantages. Septic shock after colonoscopy with PEG preparation is extremely rare, with only very few cases in critically ill patients. Herein, we describe a case of septic shock in a healthy young adult immediately following colonoscopy with PEG preparation. CASE SUMMARYA 33-year-old young adult presented to our hospital for colonoscopy with PEG bowel preparation due to recurrent diarrhea for 7 years. The male's previous physical examination showed no abnormal indicators, and colonoscopy results were normal; however, he exhibited septic shock and markedly elevated white blood cell, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin levels on the second day after colonoscopy. Immediate resuscitation and intensive care with appropriate antibiotics improved his condition. However, the blood and stool cultures did not detect the pathogen. CONCLUSIONSeptic shock after colonoscopy is rare, especially in young adults. The authors considered the possibility of opportunistic infections after PEG bowel preparation, and clinicians should monitor patients for the possibility of such complications. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2307-8960 2307-8960 |
DOI: | 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11652 |