Cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics for disease classification

Objectives This study investigated the discriminability of quantitative radiomics features extracted from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and healthy (NOR) patients. Methods The data of two hundred and eighty-three patients with HCM ( n = 48) or DCM ( n = 52) and NOR ( n = 123) were extracted from two publicly available datasets. Ten feature selection methods were first performed on twenty-one different sets of radiomics features extracted from the left ventricle, right ventricle, and myocardium segmented from CMR images in the end-diastolic frame, end-systolic frame, and a combination of both; then, nine classical machine learning methods were trained with the selected radiomics features to distinguish HCM, DCM, and NOR. Ninety classification models were constructed based on combinations of the ten feature selection methods and nine classifiers. The classification models were evaluated, and the optimal model was selected. The diagnostic performance of the selected model was also compared to that of state-of-the-art methods. Results The random forest minimum redundancy maximum relevance model with features based on LeastAxisLength, Maximum2DDiameterSlice, Median, MinorAxisLength, Sphericity, VoxelVolume, Kurtosis, Flatness, and Skewness was the highest performing model, achieving 91.2% classification accuracy. The cross-validated areas under the curve on the test dataset were 0.938, 0.966, and 0.936 for NOR, DCM, and HCM, respectively. Furthermore, compared with those of the state-of-the-art methods, the sensitivity and accuracy of this model were greatly improved. Conclusions A predictive model was proposed based on CMR radiomics features for classifying HCM, DCM, and NOR patients. The model had good discriminability. Key Points • The first-order features and the features extracted from the LOG-filtered images have potential in distinguishing HCM patients from DCM patients. • The features extracted from the RV play little role in distinguishing DCM from HCM. • The VoxelVolume of the myocardium in the ED frame is important in the recognition of DCM.