Outcome of Direct Pulp Capping Using Calcium Hydroxide: A Long-term Retrospective Study
This retrospective study evaluated the long-term outcome of direct pulp capping in mature teeth using specific case selection and treatment procedures. Teeth with pulp exposure due to advanced caries and clinical diagnosis of reversible pulpitis were treated by direct pulp capping. Treatments were c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 2023-01, Vol.49 (1), p.45-54 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This retrospective study evaluated the long-term outcome of direct pulp capping in mature teeth using specific case selection and treatment procedures.
Teeth with pulp exposure due to advanced caries and clinical diagnosis of reversible pulpitis were treated by direct pulp capping. Treatments were conducted over a period of 15 years by a single operator. Under magnification, caries was completely removed, the exposed pulp examined, and capped with either pure calcium hydroxide or a calcium hydroxide-based cement. The cavity was restored and the long-term outcome evaluated from 1 to >35 years. Teeth that were asymptomatic, responded to sensibility pulp tests within normal limits, and showed no radiographic periapical changes were categorized as success. Teeth with no response to pulp tests and/or showing radiographic evidence of apical periodontitis were classified as failures. The effects of independent variables (sex, age, symptoms, number and size of pulp exposures, bleeding time, capping material, bases used over the capping material, and final coronal restoration) on the outcome were evaluated.
In general, 225 teeth from 148 patients were available for follow-up examination in at least one of the evaluated periods. The success rate of the direct pulp capping procedure was 100%, 95%, 95%, 86%, and 89% at 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 35-year follow-up examination, respectively. The main variable significantly affecting the treatment outcome in all follow-up periods was the quality/presence of coronal restoration (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.joen.2022.11.005 |