Clinical, radiographic, and esthetic evaluation of immediate implant placement with buccal bone dehiscence in the anterior maxilla: A 1‐year prospective case series

Objectives To evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placement with buccal bone dehiscence in the anterior maxilla. Methods In this case series, implants were inserted immediately after tooth extraction in sockets with buccal bone dehiscence. Guided bone rege...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2023-02, Vol.25 (1), p.3-10
Hauptverfasser: Qian, Shu‐Jiao, Pu, Yi‐ping, Zhang, Xiao‐Meng, Wu, Xin‐yu, Liu, Bei‐lei, Lai, Hong‐Chang, Shi, Jun‐Yu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placement with buccal bone dehiscence in the anterior maxilla. Methods In this case series, implants were inserted immediately after tooth extraction in sockets with buccal bone dehiscence. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) with a papilla preservation flap and simultaneous connective tissue grafting (CTG) was used. The following outcome variables were measured: mid‐facial mucosal recession, probing depth, bleeding on probing, Pink Esthetic Score (PES), marginal bone loss, and thickness of buccal bone plate (TBP). Results 12 patients were recruited. Stable mid‐facial mucosal level (−0.03 ± 0.17 mm) and excellent soft‐tissue esthetic outcomes (PES, 9.17 ± 0.72) were achieved at 1 year. The TBP at platform level was 2.01 ± 0.31 mm at 1‐year follow up with a resorption rate of 28.90% ± 15.14%. Conclusions Immediate implant placement using GBR performed with a papilla preservation approach and simultaneous CTG is a feasible treatment procedure in compromised extraction sockets in the anterior region. Favorable esthetic outcomes and buccal bone thickness were obtained. Further studies were needed to evaluate the long‐term tissue alteration.
ISSN:1523-0899
1708-8208
DOI:10.1111/cid.13154