Semantics vs Syntax vs Computations: Machine Models for Type-2 Polynomial-Time Bounded Functionals

This paper investigates analogs of the Kreisel–Lacombe–Shoenfield Theorem in the context of the type-2 basic feasible functionals. We develop a direct, polynomial-time analog of effective operation in which the time bounding on computations is modeled after Kapron and Cook's scheme for their ba...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of computer and system sciences 1997-06, Vol.54 (3), p.424-436
1. Verfasser: Royer, James S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper investigates analogs of the Kreisel–Lacombe–Shoenfield Theorem in the context of the type-2 basic feasible functionals. We develop a direct, polynomial-time analog of effective operation in which the time bounding on computations is modeled after Kapron and Cook's scheme for their basic polynomial-time functionals. We show that if P=NP, these polynomial-time effective operations are strictly more powerful on R (the class of recursive functions) than the basic feasible functions. We also consider a weaker notion of polynomial-time effective operation where the machines computing these functionals have access to the computations of their procedural parameter, but not to its program text. For this version of polynomial-time effective operations, the analog of the Kreisel–Lacombe–Shoenfield is shown to hold—their power matches that of the basic feasible functionals on R.
ISSN:0022-0000
1090-2724
DOI:10.1006/jcss.1997.1487