Clinical outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device therapy as bridge to transplant strategy in muscular dystrophy: a single-center study

Objective In muscular dystrophies (MD) patients with end-stage heart failure (HF), continuous flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) therapy is still controversial due to a progressive nature of MD-associated muscle weakness. Methods All the MD patients who had cf- VAD implants between March...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2023-06, Vol.71 (6), p.347-353
Hauptverfasser: Gyoten, Takayuki, Amiya, Eisuke, Kinoshita, Osamu, Tsuji, Masaki, Kimura, Mitsutoshi, Hatano, Masaru, Ono, Minoru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective In muscular dystrophies (MD) patients with end-stage heart failure (HF), continuous flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) therapy is still controversial due to a progressive nature of MD-associated muscle weakness. Methods All the MD patients who had cf- VAD implants between March 2013 and August 2019 in our hospital were retrospectively studied. Study end points were death, major LVAD-associated complications or respiratory dysfunction caused by muscular weakness. Results A total of 11 MD patients (Becker type: n  = 6; Emery–Dreifuss Myodystrophy: n  = 2; Fukuyama subtype: n  = 1; Limb-girdle 1B: n  = 2) were enrolled. Demographics: median age 41 years (IQR; 29–47); median Japanese Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support: level 3 (2–3); a median interval between MD diagnosis and LVAD implantation 9 years (6–18). The pulmonary function test at LVAD implantation showed a median of %VC; 62% (45–82), FEV 1% , 82% (81–88). Survival to discharge was 100% without pulmonary complication and early VAD-related complications. During a median follow-up of 38 months (27–53), re-admissions were needed due to device infection ( n  = 2), cerebrovascular accidents (disabling, n  = 2 and non-disabling, n  = 2), ventricular tachycardia ( n  = 4), and right HF ( n  = 3), respectively. 7 patients received successful heart transplant after a median waiting time of 44 months (34–61); 3 patients are still on the waiting list (waiting time: 21, 38, and 39 months). One patient died of right HF 15 months after VAD implantation. No one had overt pulmonary dysfunction during LVAD support. Conclusion In selected MD patients with end-stage HF, cf-LVAD therapy is a viable therapeutic option as bridge to heart transplant.
ISSN:1863-6705
1863-6713
DOI:10.1007/s11748-022-01889-1