The effect of urinary diversion on renal function after cystectomy for bladder cancer: comparison between ileal conduit, orthotopic ileal neobladder, and heterotopic ileocecal pouch

Purpose To explore the impact of ileal conduit (IC), orthotopic ileal neobladder, and MAINZ Pouch I on renal function (RF) over time. Methods We performed a retrospective, cohort study including consecutive patients who underwent open radical cystectomy due to bladder cancer from November 2013 to Ju...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of urology 2022-12, Vol.40 (12), p.3091-3097
Hauptverfasser: Pyrgidis, Nikolaos, Sokolakis, Ioannis, Haltmair, Gena, Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To explore the impact of ileal conduit (IC), orthotopic ileal neobladder, and MAINZ Pouch I on renal function (RF) over time. Methods We performed a retrospective, cohort study including consecutive patients who underwent open radical cystectomy due to bladder cancer from November 2013 to June 2022. RF deterioration was calculated based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) through the CKD-EPI creatinine equation. A linear mixed-effects model was constructed, adjusting for multiple risk factors. The probability of achieving an eGFR reduction greater than 25% compared to baseline among different urinary diversion techniques was assessed using a Kaplan–Meier curve. Results Overall, 107 patients received IC, 28 neobladder, and 20 MAINZ Pouch I. Those receiving IC were older and displayed more comorbidities. At follow-up, eGFR was lower by 0.09 mL/min/1.73m 2 (confidence interval − 5.87 to 5.69, p  = 0.975) in patients receiving neobladder compared to those receiving IC. Similarly, eGFR was higher by 4.64 mL/min/1.73m 2 (confidence interval − 1.57 to 10.85, p  = 0.143) in patients receiving pouch compared to those receiving IC. Accordingly, patients with higher preoperative eGFR ( p  
ISSN:1433-8726
0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-022-04211-z